Skip to content
ArchiveJuly 21, 2026Sleuth
Case File · Audit · No. 027

Daily Casefile · Audit

The Swollen Ink Order at Hartley & Voss

6 min

Hartley & Voss Printing Works supplies the Birmingham Municipal Gazette and several commercial handbill clients from a shared stock of printing materials. At the close of the September quarter 1891, Foreman Edmund Briggs submitted a paper and ink usage ledger to the proprietors claiming reimbursement for all materials consumed or ordered on account during the period. The proprietors have engaged an auditor after noticing that the materials bill exceeded the previous quarter's by nearly a third despite no known increase in press runs. Your task is to examine Briggs's six ledger entries against the available supply and delivery records and identify which entry contradicts the record evidence.

The scene

Hartley & Voss Printing Works, Birmingham, England, 1891

Source documents

  • Lambert & Butler Despatch Manifest, Quarter ending 30 September 1891
  • Alderton's Printers' Sundries Invoice No. 2214, dated 18 July 1891
  • Whatman Mill Delivery Register, July 1891
  • Letter from Townsend Mills to Hartley & Voss, dated 23 August 1891

Play today’s Audit.

This case first aired on July 21, 2026. A fresh audit runs every morning — same rules, five minutes, one solution.